Why am I telling you this? I know I'm repeating myself now and then but take the position that if something isn't worth telling twice, it's not worth telling at all.

We have had:

A) change of time under the influence of speed.

B) change of "space-time" under the influence of gravity.

C) the big bang

D) dark matter and dark energy

And so there are many inscrutable, but generally accepted things to mention.

This is to make my idea about the zero space more plausible.

The solution to the riddle of the quantum entangled particle is the “zero space”. Otherwise it cannot be explained why a particle reacts directly to an action of the other particle. And Albert E.'s theory remains valid, the theory that nothing travels faster than light in empty space because space doesn't count for entangled quanta.